Differences In Rough Motoric Development, Language And Prosocial Behavior In Children Who Kindergarten Program Full Day And Regular
Keywords:
Language development, rough motor development, prosocial behavior, kindergartenAbstract
Aim/Objective: The background of this research is Targeted SDGs of quality education by 2030 ensure that all children have access to quality early development, care, and pre-primary education. The purpose of this study is to find out the differences in Roughmotoric, language and prosocial behavior development in children undergoing kindergarten and regular daytime kindergarten learning.
Material and method is Types and designs in this study use Mixed Methods namely Sequential Explanatory Designs. Population in Quantitative Research children aged 4-6 years who attend learning in kindergarten and regular programs, and qualitative research populations School Leaders, Teachers / Teaching Staff, parents. Quantitative research sample is 34 respondents in Full Day program Kindergarten and 38 people in Regular program and for Qualitative research are School Leaders, Teachers / Teaching Staff, parents, sample technique in Quantitative research is Total Sampling, and for Qualitative research is proportional simple random sampling. Examination using KPSP and prosocial behavior observation sheets in quantitative research, and in qualitative research using interview guides and focus group discussion guides. Data analysis in quantitative research uses Mann Whitney and qualitative research uses data reduction analysis techniques, data display and conclusion drawing / verification.
Results The results of quantitative research on bivariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between children undergoing full-day and regular program kindergarten. On p-value motor development was 0.008 (p <0.05), language p-value was 0.006 (p <0.05) and prosocial behavior p-value was 0.009 (p <0.05). Qualitative research results are not found any obstacles and efforts have been made to improve the quality of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior, so that it has benefited and achieved expectations of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior in children undergoing kindergarten full and regular programs.
Conclusion : The conclusion of this study is Roughmotoric, language, and prosocial behavior development. in children who undergo full-day kindergarten program is better than regular program kindergarten.
References
Kemenkes RI. 2016. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Stimulasi, Deteksi dan Intervesi Dini Tumbuh Kembang. [Diakses tanggal 26 September 2019]. Didapatkan dari : www.depkes.go.id
Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Profil Kesehatan Indonesia 2015. Agustus 2016 [Diakses tanggal 2 Juni 2019]. Didapat dari : http://www.depkes.go.id
Susilo, S. 2016. Pedoman Penyelenggaraan PAUD. Bee Media Pustaka : Jakarta. h. 3; 27-33; 43-44; 77-78.
Hurlock, E. 1978. Perkembangan Anak Jilid 1. Erlangga : Jakarta. h. 150-170; 175; 249-264.
(Asmira & Dwi, 2012).
Hamdiani Y, Siti D, Basar G. Layanan Anak Usia Dini/Prasekolah Dengan “Full day” Di Taman Penitipan Anak. Dalam : Prosiding KS: Riset & PKM Volume 3 (Nomor 2) : 155-291. [Diakses tanggal 30 Juli 2019]. Didapatkan dari : http:// fisip.unpad.ac.id
Hurlock, E. 1978. Perkembangan Anak Jilid 1. Erlangga : Jakarta. h. 150-170; 175; 249-264.
Jamaan, T. 2017. Guide To Healthy Child Development. Onbloss Creative Mandiri : Bogor. H. 20; 30; 38; 47
Rukiyah A Y, Yulianti L. 2013. Asuhan Neonatus Bayi dan Anak Balita. CV.Trans Info Media : Jakarta
Wong, dkk. 2002. Buku Ajar Keperawatan Pediatrik Volume 1. EGC : Jakarta. h. 109; 127-134; 465; 221-224